CaseSpine helps legal teams make sense of messy case material, reconstruct the factual timeline, and uncover potential contradictions — faster and with confidence.
ABC Holdings v XYZ Capital
247
Documents
83
Events
18
People
12
Potential Contradictions
Potential Contradiction
Witness Statement · ¶14
“I never received the revised pricing agreement.”
WhatsApp · 14 May 2026
“Received the pricing schedule. Let's delay our response.”
A dispute can involve hundreds or thousands of pages of correspondence, statements, contracts, invoices, messages and records. The challenge is not simply reading documents. The challenge is connecting them.
Important facts are scattered across unrelated-looking documents and communications.
Legal teams spend valuable time comparing statements, dates, events and evidence by hand.
An insight is only useful when the team can quickly locate the underlying evidence.
CaseSpine organizes messy evidence into a structured factual picture of the matter — so related facts, people, events and documents stay connected to one another.
Once the spine exists, the matter can be read as a sequence rather than a pile — and every step points back to the record it came from.
Minutes · p.4
Chat export · 09:41
Contract_v3.pdf
Statement A · ¶14
Each matter is scoped before any confidential material changes hands.
Tell us about the matter and securely share case materials after scope is agreed.
Documents, messages and statements are processed and structured.
The system organizes facts, people, events and evidence and cross-references related information.
Potential inconsistencies are surfaced and linked back to their source material.
Receive a structured evidence review report for your legal team's review.
Not another AI chat transcript. A structured evidence review built around the matter.
Evidence Review Report
ABC Holdings v XYZ Capital
Illustrative sample · fictional matter · not legal advice
Page 1 / 6
Witness Statement
¶17
“I never attended the 12 June meeting.”
Signed 03 Jun 2026
Meeting Minutes
Page 4
“Witness A listed as attendee.”
Recorded 12 Jun 2026
The statement and contemporaneous meeting record describe incompatible attendance. This is a potential inconsistency requiring lawyer review; the system does not determine whether the witness is truthful.
“Ask questions about your documents.”
An answer appears in a chat window. Nothing is retained, nothing is structured, and the next question starts from zero.
“Build a structured picture of the matter and trace potential contradictions back to their sources.”
The case structure persists. Every flagged inconsistency carries a route back to the record it came from.
Related facts, people, events and evidence remain connected across the whole matter — not rebuilt for every question.
Important findings point back to the supplied evidence, so your team can open the underlying record immediately.
AI flags potential issues. Lawyers review. Legal professionals decide.
The result is structured evidence review work product, not another chatbot conversation.
These are common engagements rather than limits. If your matter has volume and conflicting accounts, it is worth a scope enquiry.
Contract chains, pricing correspondence and performance records across long relationships.
Board records, resolutions and informal messaging that rarely tell the same story.
Site records, variation orders, programme changes and delay narratives.
Performance history, internal communications and process documentation.
Transaction trails, authorisations and account-of-events reconstruction.
Large exhibit bundles, witness statements and expert material under tribunal deadlines.
Initial website enquiries collect scope only — matter type, approximate volume, evidence categories and timing.
Please noteConfidential client documents should not be uploaded through the public enquiry form. After scope and quotation are agreed, secure document submission is arranged directly with your team.
We describe only what we actually operate. CaseSpine makes no claim to third-party certification, and we will tell you plainly what handling arrangements apply to your matter before anything is shared.
Nothing confidential travels through this website. Document submission is arranged separately once scope and quotation are agreed.
Evidence is handled per matter, and access is limited to the people working on that matter.
Findings record the evidence they were drawn from, so the review can be retraced.
Output is prepared for professional review. It is never presented as a conclusion or as legal advice.
Every matter is different. Give us the high-level scenario and we'll assess complexity, evidence volume and turnaround before providing a tailored quotation.
No. CaseSpine is an AI-assisted evidence intelligence service. It helps surface potential inconsistencies and organize supplied evidence. Legal professionals remain responsible for professional judgment.